Pepe wrote:
> What is wrong with the agenda in the last line?
> (-`%)@.((0 1)"_) 1 2 3 4 5
> |rank error
Nothing wrong with the expression; the interpreter has a bug.
I guess few people use verbal agenda to construct trains, so this hasn't
been caught before. Most often agenda is used to select a single verb
from the agenda, so agenda expects the verb to return a scalar.
I tried a workaround. I boxed the list so that the verb returns a scalar,
which should have no effect on the train produced (the box would
theoretically just put a pair of parens around the train):
(-`%)@.((<0 1)"_) 1 2 3 4 5
|length error
| (-`%)@.((<0 1)"_)1 2 3 4 5
but no joy.
-Dan
----- Original Message ---------------
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Wrong agenda?
From: Don Guinn <dongu...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:47:05 -0700
To: Programming forum <programming@jsoftware.com>
Added parens to make the rank apply to the entire expression.
((-`%)@.((0 1))"_) 1 2 3 4 5
0 1.5 2.66667 3.75 4.8
Is this what you wanted?
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 7:07 AM, Jose Mario Quintana <
josemarioquint...@2bestsystems.com> wrote:
> What is wrong with the agenda in the last line?
>
> (- %) 1 2 3 4 5
> 0 1.5 2.66666667 3.75 4.8
>
> (-`%)@.(0 1) 1 2 3 4 5
> 0 1.5 2.66666667 3.75 4.8
>
> (-`%)@.((0 1)"_) 1 2 3 4 5
> |rank error
> | (-`%)@.((0 1)"_)1 2 3 4 5
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
