Roger wrote: > There is no bug. The > forms m...@.n and m...@.v are > fundamentally different.
Pepe quoted the DoJ: > The ca...@.v uses the result of the > verb v to perform the selection. and wrote: > How is m...@.v using the verb (0 1)"_ > to (try to) perform the selection? I agree with Pepe. There is no support for this behavior in the DoJ. In fact, a plain reading of the DoJ contradicts this behavior. Of course, the Dictionary could be changed to eliminate the contradiction (by describing the interpreter's behavior). But IMO it would be more useful to make the interpreter match the Dictionary (and to maintain the general pattern than u C v n <--> u C (v n) ). -Dan ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
