On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 7:35 AM, Dan Bron <[email protected]> wrote: > Let us recall that composite numbers can also serve as bases (e.g. 2*5). > The "roundest base" may indeed be composite number, so we have to consider > all the divisors of the inputs, not just the prime factors.
I can not imagine any case where a composite number would be the smallest, roundest base. Its factors would always be just as round, if not rounder. If you want to go for largest roundest base, then this might be worth pursuing? -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
