> Van: [email protected] [mailto:programming- > [email protected]] Namens Skip Cave >(...) > If definitions were written with more redundancy, such as by repeating the > same definition in another way using different words, the chances of > erroneous interpretation would be lessened. > > Conciseness is good in an unambiguous language, and not so good in an > ambiguous one. It would probably help most newcomers to J to have a more > redundant DoJ and Vocabulary > > I have always felt the Iverson's penchant for conciseness was a huge asset > for language design, but a detriment for the documentation. > > Skip Cave
Amen. R.E. Boss ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
