On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:22 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > Another alternative (which I have not proved to myself > is adequate) might be something like: > merge=: , /: >:@I.~,I.
This will not work: merge=: , /: >:@I.~,I. 5 8 merge 4 6 4 6 5 8 This seems to be better: merge=: , /: I.~(([...@]),])I. But I still have not proved that it is adequate. FYI, -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
