Ric, I think I can use your first suggestion. Let me see. Thanks.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Sherlock, Ric <[email protected]> wrote: > > I don't think you can get what you want by only changing x & m. > The major stumbling block is that the whole of m will apply to every > application of x to y. > I think you want to end up with something like the following: > > (70 90) (0 0 1;1 1 2)} (2#,: i.2 3) > 0 70 2 > 3 4 5 > > 0 1 2 > 3 4 90 > -- (B=) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
