Ooops, scratch the question below, silly me, just saw what's happening there, i.e. 'N - i.M' rather than 'N (-i.) M' but, if anything, this makes the grammatical breakdown of 14 */ @ (-i.) 3 a bit trickier...
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 19:20 +0000, Alex Gian wrote: > For, instance I can see that > that 14(-i.)3 will give 14 13 12 > (where is this documented? I also discovered [by chance] that 'n +i. m' > will give ascending ranges for integer m, n). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
