Thanks, Dan.

I certainly didn't do those kinds of operations with boxes (I guess, yet).

I do remember (Henry's, but may be he wasn't first) advice not to make boxes 
small (i.e., with small content). Once I was solving a problem "write a program 
which puts + - * / ^ and () operations around five 9 to make 1000", and found 
out that boxes slow things down quite noticeably. So I'm trying to avoid need 
for boxes as much as I can - though not for the price of having to filter out 
0's in

1 2 0 0
3 4 5 6
7 8 9 0

I guess you're right - implicit boxing wouldn't buy much in terms of 
performance, but brief boxing gives you both precision (you don't need to guess 
if this thing is boxed - you just see that) and convenience (not too hard to 
add &.> whenever needed).

Alexander



      
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to