Sorry Devon it's not for the timing I pointed to that. It's just for the comparison of both results.
> xx-:xx2 > 0 > Hallo Devon McCormick, je schreef op 11-03-10 21:25: > That's two out of a million - I doubt the timer is precise enough to capture > the difference between the two cases. > > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Aai <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> Hallo Devon McCormick, je schreef op 11-03-10 20:11: >> >>> It's a pretty good improvement already. >>> >>> hc10k =: , ] +/@:{~ (,&<: -.)@{: >>> AnN =: % 1+i.@:# NB. a(n)/n >>> MxAnN =: >./;.1~ 2 (=<.)@:^. 1...@# NB. Max a(n)/n btw successive >>> >> 2^ >> >>> HCF=. 3 : '1 1,(#2...@#);(,<@;@(|.@(#;. 1) (],~1$~[)&.> >>> <@:>:;.1)@>@{:)^:(y-2) <2' >>> >>> 6!:2 'xx=. mx...@ann 1 1 hc10k @]^:[~ 2^20' >>> 2485.4382 >>> 6!:2 'xx2=. mx...@ann HCF 20' >>> 0.38284575 >>> xx-:xx2 >>> 0 >>> >>> >>> >> be careful in choosing comparable arguments: >> in this case hc10k needs _2+2^20 >> >> -- >> Met vriendelijke groet, >> =@@i >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> >> > > > -- Met vriendelijke groet, =@@i ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
