Perfect. All is clear. Thanks, Raul. On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Tracy Harms <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'd appreciate elaboration on these components of propositional logic. > Not > > only do I not follow the meaning of >& in the adverb's argument, I don't > see > > why > > > > >&2 exists _1 0 2 > > 0 > > No number greater than 2 exists in the list _1 0 2 > > > given that > > > > >&0 exists _1 0 2 > > 1 > > A number greater than 1 exists in the list _1 0 2 > > > >&_1 exists _1 0 2 > > 1 > > A number greater than _1 exists in the list _1 0 2 > > > I don't know how to state a conventional there-exists proposition that > > matches the meaning of any of these examples. > > Does the above help? > > -- > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
