I did not know primp; I meant pimp as in pimp-my-ride.
I was aware of the original(?) meaning of pimp.
Thanks anyhow.


R.E. Boss



> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: [email protected] [mailto:programming-
> [email protected]] Namens Dan Bron
> Verzonden: maandag 12 april 2010 17:07
> Aan: 'Programming forum'
> Onderwerp: Re: [Jprogramming] boxes
> 
> Pimping was an appropriate term:
> 
>       http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=pimped%20out&page=2
>       http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pimp_My_Ride
> 
> -Dan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:programming-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Roger Hui
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 2010 10:51 AM
> To: Programming forum
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] boxes
> 
> I assume you meant "primping" rather than "pimping". :-)
> If it is a typo it's a pretty bad one and can get you
> into a lot of trouble in other contexts.
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "R.E. Boss" <[email protected]>
> Date: Monday, April 12, 2010 1:40
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] boxes
> To: 'Programming forum' <[email protected]>
> 
> > Thanks to Hui who showed me how to "rank" operators and after
> > pimping kfcs1
> > a bit I come to
> >
> > kfcs1=: 3 : 0
> >  (i.>:{:$y) kfcs1 y
> > :
> >  t=. (([: +/"(1) 0 = ]) </. ]) 3 #.^:_1 i.3^{:$y
> >  t=. ((- *),: 2 + 0 = ])"(1) ; x { |.t
> >  c=. ({. , +/ , 0 ,: {:) y
> >  t 4 : 'x}y'"1 _ c
> > )
> >
> >    C=: 10 20 30 40 ,: 1 2 3 4
> >
> >    $ kfcs1 C
> > 81 2 4
> >
> >    ({:"2</.]) 3 kfcs1 C
> > +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
> > |10 20 30 40|10 20 30 40|10 20 30 40|10 20 30 40|
> > | 1  2  3  0| 1  2  0  4| 1
> > 0  3  4| 0  2  3  4|
> > |
> > |           |           |           |
> > |10 20 30 44|10 20 33 40|10 22 30 40|11 20 30 40|
> > | 1  2  3  0| 1  2  0  4| 1
> > 0  3  4| 0  2  3  4|
> > +-----------+-----------+-----------+-----------+
> >
> >
> > R.E. Boss
> >
> >
> > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > > Van: [email protected] [mailto:programming-
> > > [email protected]] Namens R.E. Boss
> > > Verzonden: zondag 11 april 2010 18:23
> > > Aan: 'Programming forum'
> > > Onderwerp: Re: [Jprogramming] boxes
> > >
> > > I discovered a nice solution using the method of Jacobi, see
> > > http://jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2010-April/019081.html
> > > His method essentially gave the structure, the rest was amending.
> > >
> > > kfcs1=: 3 : 0
> > >  (i.>:{:$y) kfcs1 y
> > > :
> > >  t=. ((-*),:2+0=])"(1) (#~ x e.~ [:+/"(1) 0=]) 3 #.^:_1
> > i.3^{:$y>  c=. ({. , +/ , 0 ,: {:) y
> > >  t amnd c
> > > )
> > >
> > > amnd=: 4 : 0
> > >  s=. {:$y
> > > ($x)$ ,((s*x) +"1 i.s) { ,y
> > > )
> > >
> > > I had to introduce a verb for higher order amends.
> > >
> > > C=: 4 3 0 ,: _4 _3 _2
> > >
> > >     2 (kfcs -:&:([:/:~@,<"2) kfcs1) C
> > > 1
> > >
> > >      (kfcs -:&:([:/:~@,<"2) kfcs1) C
> > > 1
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to