I'd also encourage you to provide an example of the problem you want to solve 
(ideally including example inputs & outputs), forum members may come up with 
alternative solutions perhaps even some that don't require "0 

> From: Dan Bron
> Sent: Wednesday, 8 September 2010 09:21
...
> 
> That applies to J as well, though I would add an intermediate step "...
> complain on the Forums and see what answers you get first, ...".  
...
> 
> -Dan
> 
> 
> Please excuse typos; composed on a handheld device.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Justin Paston-Cooper <[email protected]>
> Sender: [email protected]
> Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 21:47:30
> To: Programming forum<[email protected]>
> Reply-To: Programming forum <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Collecting Results
> 
> Thanks a lot. I always forget about boxed lists. Applying ; to that
> gives exactly what I want. Is there any way to do it without boxing,
> though? This will be applied many times and I don't know how efficient
> this will be.
> 
> On 7 September 2010 21:32, Dan Bron <[email protected]> wrote:
> > You want m&.> f   .  Note this is rank 0 already, so no reason for an
> explicit"0  .
> >
> > I'm on the road right now so I can't post a fuller explanation, but
> it might be understandable if you're told that <@m"0 f  is equivalent,
> and that > is both scalar (rank zero) and an identity function on an
> open (non-boxed) noun.
> >
> > -Dan
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Please excuse typos; composed on a handheld device.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Justin Paston-Cooper <[email protected]>
> > Sender: [email protected]
> > Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 21:09:37
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Reply-To: Programming forum <[email protected]>
> > Subject: [Jprogramming] Collecting Results
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Let's say I have a monad m " 0 and a 1-dimensional array f. The monad
> > returns 1-dimensional arrays of varying results which may include 0.
> I
> > would like to efficiently apply the monad m to array f and collect
> the
> > results returned by m in a 1-dimensional array. m f would not be
> > satisfactory because 0s may be added to the ends of the results which
> > are shorter than the longest result. Is this possible? Thanks for
> your
> > advice in advance.
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> > For information about J forums see
> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to