It isn't hard to parse, but I can't say I find it easy to read. I think that is 
because it has several irrelevant steps that make me wonder what it is trying 
to do. I think the following are equivalent and easier to read (for me)
  [: +/ (({.&.":)&>@p:@i.
or
+/@(({.&.":)&>@p:@i.)

Please excuse typos; composed on a handheld device.

-----Original Message-----
From: Björn Helgason <gos...@gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, 16 November 2010 04:39
To: Programming forum <programming@jsoftware.com>
Subject: [Jprogramming] tacit programming


It would be interesting to know how many J ers can easily read tacit
programs.

A line like

[: +/ [: > [: ".&.> [: [ [: {.&.> [: [ [: ":&.>@p: i.

This is something I am not too comfortable to read nor write just like that
even if I do know what it is supposed to do.

Question is if people see it as a better way to program like this tacitly
than just do it in more lines and easily understood steps?

--
Björn Helgason, Verkfræðingur
Fornustekkum II
781 Hornafirði,
t-póst: gos...@gmail.com
gsm: +3546985532
sími: +3544781286
http://groups.google.com/group/J-Programming


Tæknikunnátta höndlar hið flókna, sköpunargáfa er meistari einfaldleikans

góður kennari getur stigið á tær án þess að glansinn fari af skónum
          /|_      .-----------------------------------.
         ,'  .\  /  | Með léttri lund verður        |
     ,--'    _,'   | Dagurinn í dag                     |
    /       /       | Enn betri en gærdagurinn  |
   (   -.  |        `-----------------------------------'
   |     ) |         (\_ _/)
  (`-.  '--.)       (='.'=)   ♖♘♗♕♔♙
   `. )----'        (")_(") ☃☠
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to