Looks like a bug. The answer is not "wrong" because _1 and 255 are equivalent modulo 256, but the answer from #: should be in standard form.
----- Original Message ----- From: bill lam <[email protected]> Date: Wednesday, December 8, 2010 0:03 Subject: [Jprogramming] #: on integer of internal complex type To: jprogramming <[email protected]> > Is the following expected behavior? > 256 256#: 255 > 0 255 > 256 256#: (0.2-0.2)+255 > 0 255 > 256 256#: (0j1-0j1)+255 > 1 _1 > > tested on both J602 and J701beta ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
