Don wrote:
> Look at the verb "trace" defined in
> J7 '~addons/general/misc/trace.ijs'.
Thanks. I thought about this too, but figured if I could just write an
appropriate x&;: and uni2Puny (which I'd have to do anyway), and applied ". ,
that would be enough. That is, I wouldn't have to write my own parser, or
understand or adapt the one in trace.
> I should have gone to the trouble to understand
> trace as it would have done a much better job.
But I'm interested in why you concluded this. Can you give me a little
background on the project and why you think trace would have done a better job?
> handling copulas
I can see how writing my own parser would allow me to support sentences like:
← =: =:
... but I'm not sure that's worth it to me. I don't prefer it, but I think I'm
ok with forcing my users to write copulae the standard way.
-Dan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
