I don't know whether this would be sufficient. It would be nice to have exact probabilities, but I haven't really reasoned about the space required. 13! is already 6227020800, and there's going to be a table for each stage in each game. Ultimately I would like to use the probabilities to play this game on-line, finding bets which go against the calculated probabilities. I'd start worrying about the randomness of the games.
On 3 March 2011 15:27, Devon McCormick <[email protected]> wrote: > If you did this stochastically, i.e. by sampling randomly, you could > concentrate on the playing algorithm and trade off space for time to achieve > as much precision you need. Also, a stochastic version is easily > parallelizable - see > http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/DevonMcCormick/ParallelizedJCodeExamples for > an example of how you could do this. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
