Connection Machine, eh? Now there's a blast from the past.

It might intrigue you to know that our contributor specialises in
quantum computing. This, I have only recently been brought to realise,
holds out the promise of "connection machines" beyond our wildest
imaginings.

Prime factorisation, anyone, to routinely crack the best of today's
encryption? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shor%27s_algorithm

But I'm at risk of giving too much away. Keep an eye on the Vector website...


On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:05 AM, Roger Hui <[email protected]> wrote:
> The cited article has the passage:
>
>  The key adverb was not in the initial version of J.
>  It came in later at the request of the J user community,
>  notably Joey Tuttle.
>
> This is not consistent with what I remember.
> I first saw the idea in the 1980s in
> the documentation for the Connection Machine,
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Connection_Machine
> which had a machine instruction for doing
> x f//.y for a small set of functions f and certain x's.
> In any case, the October 1990 dictionary
> had u/. with the same definition as now.
> (The earliest public version of J, available
> at APL90, was dated July 1990.
> http://www.jsoftware.com/papers/J1990.htm
> That version did not have "key".)
>
> In any case, it is true that many case of the
> special code for u/. are "JKT specials",
> implemented in response to code Joey posted
> or in expectation that they would be useful
> for what he does.
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lettow, Kenneth" <[email protected]>
> Date: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 17:37
> Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] Aggregation
> To: Programming forum <[email protected]>
>
>> Ian,
>>
>> I best understood key after reading a book you edited ;-)
>>
>> To summarize... http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/Doc/Articles/Play151
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>> Ken
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [email protected]
>> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ian Clark
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2011 5:09 PM
>> To: Programming forum
>> Subject: [Jprogramming] Aggregation
>>
>> I'm being lazy here. But I need a better answer than I can devil out
>> myself. It occurs in a recent submission to Vector...
>>
>> I have an array like this (which may be unsorted, and can grow very
>> large):
>>
>> 1     100
>> 1     100
>> 1     20
>> 1     400
>> 2     30
>> 2     200
>> 2     300
>> 33    100
>> 33    100
>> 33    100
>>
>> I want to collapse it to:
>>
>> 1     620
>> 2     530
>> 33    300
>>
>> i.e. summing over subheadings.
>> The original example had A B C  in place of 1 2 33, but
>> numbers will
>> do, to save boxing. We don't know the full set of A B C ... in
>> advance. Nothing to be assumed about the first column, except it is
>> +ve integers. But I'm also interested in the case where the first
>> column lies in the set: i.(n) for some n>0. In other words they
>> can be
>> squashed up.
>>
>> 1. There's simply got to be a "jem" to do it. Suggestions, please.
>>       - Transpose the array if you wish. Box it: 1 100 ; 1 100 ; 1 20
>> ; ...
>> -whatever.
>>       - No, of course I don't want a looping solution :)
>>
>> 2. What do you call this process? I call it "aggregation" -- but I
>> think the name differs across disciplines.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to