Ok, yes, I found it, thank you: http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/System/Interpreter/Requests#verbpipelines
It's interesting that Dan also proposed using `:1 for this functionalty. I suppose, now that the source code has been publicly released, its possible for us to hack this in on some copies. But unless we have some hope of the changes being accepted into the main interpreter those changes would be meaningless. (New terminology is only worthwhile if people that use the language mean it the same way -- though in this case I have some confidence that this one could have the same meaning even when re-invented.) -- Raul On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 7:26 AM, Tracy Harms <[email protected]> wrote: > This has been requested before. I would very much enjoy having this. > On May 18, 2011 10:19 PM, "Raul Miller" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Currently, we do not have an evoke option to concatenate a series of >> verbs together. >> >> Has anyone ever asked for one? >> >> In other words, f`g`h`:1 y would produce the result of f g h y. >> >> (Though the number 1 is arbitrary and could be replaced with something > else.) >> >> Here's a model for what I mean by concatenate a series of verbs together: >> >> concat=:1 :0 >> ((] #~ i.@# -.@e. _2 + #),({.[:`''),.m)`:6 >> ) >> >> f=:1000&+ >> g=:100&+ >> h=:10&+ >> f`g`h concat 1 >> 1111 >> >> -- >> Raul >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
