The format of A came up in a more extended problem I was working on.
I did realize it represents a tree and know how to transfer it to other
representations, but I wanted a solution from the format at hand. 
Then I was not very happy  with the one I found, so that was reason to ask
it to the forum (and I could practice my ability of writing specifications
in plain text).
Which brought me Lanzavecchia's algorithm.


R.E. Boss
 

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: [email protected] [mailto:programming-
> [email protected]] Namens Raul Miller
> Verzonden: donderdag 4 augustus 2011 21:38
> Aan: Programming forum
> Onderwerp: Re: [Jprogramming] complicated sums of subarrays
> 
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 2:53 PM, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Let's think of a family, only men, with fathers, children,
grandchildren,
> grandfathers and so on. Each father can have several kids, but a kid can
only
> have one father. Each one of the members of this family has numeric mark
> which he passes on to all his kids, so that the kids have their own number
> plus that of their father.
> 
> If that is a statement of the problem, then wouldn't a logical data
structure
> representing the relationship be, for each family member, the index of
their
> parent?
> 
> In other words:
>    I=: >./@I.(>/~i.#A)*.(=/ >:)A  NB. parent indices
>    T=: (~.@,&.> ;@:{L:0 1~)^:_ I>.0  NB. transitive closure
>    R=: (i.#B) ~.@,L:0"0 T  NB. reflexive closure
>    +/@:{&B&> R  NB. sum
> 14 30 22 28 33 36 34 50 50 69 35 34 37 38 46 49 66 49 43 48 65 72 52
> 
> Ok, that looks like the data he asked for.
> 
> I expect that this particular formulation could be simplified somewhat by
> using a bit representation of connections all the way through.
> 
> But I think A is an awkward representation of the relationship.
> 
> Also, this makes me wish for K's \
> 
> --
> Raul
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to