I get different results for ML and SH when I trim the data sets a
little for my slower computer.
AA=: data 10 3e2
BB=: data 1e2
findinRows_SH=: +./@((*. +./\.)/@|:@(=/))
findinRows_ML=: [: *@#@> [: ([ #~ (< {:))&.>/ <@I.@(=/~)
(AA findinRows_ML BB)-:(AA findinRows_SH BB)
0
(AA findinRows_ML BB)
1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
(AA findinRows_SH BB)
1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I like Shaw's approach.
>
> However, the efficiency issue is data dependent:
>
> findinRows_SH=: +./@((*. +./\.)/@|:@(=/))
> findinRows_ML=: [: *@#@> [: ([ #~ (< {:))&.>/ <@I.@(=/~)
> data=: 'ACGT' {~ 4 ?.@$~ ]
> AA=: data 20 3e3
> BB=: data 1e3
>
> ts 'AA findinRows_SH BB'
> 2.54335 1.34548e8
> ts 'AA findinRows_ML BB'
> 1.09949 2.34531e8
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
