On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Steven Taylor <[email protected]> wrote: > so you'd suggest recreating?
That might be the most robust, if someone changes jmf. Or you could also update the header. A quick experiment on jmf files suggests that the allocated length is stored at byte offset 16 (bytes 16, 17, 18 and 19). And open'jmf' and then searching for the string 'bad jmf header' finds only one match, which looks like this: if. 0=validate ts,had do. 'bad jmf header' assert 0[free fh,mh,fad end. So hypothetically you could change the value stored in the header to match the new file size (simplest approach with changing file sizes) or you could update jmf itself, if supporting your changes interests you. -- Raul ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
