Thank you!  I have always liked that quote.

On 10/21/2011 12:19 AM, Eldon Eller wrote:
>       “When /I/ use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful
> tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.”
>       “The question is,” said Alice, “whether you /can/ make words mean
> so many different things.”
>       “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be masterthat’s
> all.”
>       Alice was too much puzzled to say anything, so after a minute
> Humpty Dumpty began again. “They’ve a temper, some of them—particularly
> verbs, they’re the proudest—adjectives you can do anything with, but not
> verbs—however, /I/ can manage the whole lot! Impenetrability! That’s
> what /I/ say!
>
> --- Lewis Carroll, "Through the Looking Glass." It is evident that Lewis
> Carroll was a mathematician.
>
>
> On 10/20/2011 09:45 PM, Ric Sherlock wrote:
>> I'm very happy thinking of a scalar as a zero rank array. I.e. scalars
>> aren't distinct from arrays, they are just a type of array.
>>
>> Distinguishing a scalar from a single-element list can be confusing,
>> but the same issue applies to lists and single-row tables etc. It is
>> not confined to scalars vs arrays.
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 5:28 PM, Alan Stebbens<[email protected]>   wrote:
>>> On Oct 20, 2011, at 8:24 PM, Roger Hui wrote:
>>>
>>>> You have to use a different word than "noun".  It's already taken and
>>>> it means "array".
>>> Roger,
>>>
>>> I have to agree with Rich.
>>>
>>> With all due respect (and that is not a trite phrase -- I really _do_ 
>>> respect the tremendous work and thought that you have put into APL and J), 
>>> it seems incorrect to me to say that the word "noun" means "array".
>>>
>>> The object on which verbs operate, that is, a noun, can be either an array, 
>>> or a scalar.
>>>
>>> The J Primer says that
>>>
>>>> In the following sentence the numbers 2 and 5 are both nouns.
>>>>
>>>>      2 + 5
>>> In the example, both 2 and 5 are scalars.   So, a noun, by definition, is 
>>> at least a scalar.
>>>
>>> But, from other examples, we know that a noun can also be an array.
>>>
>>> So a noun is either a scalar or an array.
>>>
>>> This can be demonstrated in J itself:
>>>
>>>>      f =: 3 : 0
>>>> (('Rank';$$y),:('Shape';$y)),'Tally';#y
>>>> )
>>>>      f ''   NB. strings are arrays, even empty strings
>>>> ┌─────┬─┐
>>>> │Rank │1│
>>>> ├─────┼─┤
>>>> │Shape│0│
>>>> ├─────┼─┤
>>>> │Tally│0│
>>>> └─────┴─┘
>>>>      f 1     NB. pass a scalar (no rank)
>>>> ┌─────┬─┐
>>>> │Rank │0│
>>>> ├─────┼─┤
>>>> │Shape│ │
>>>> ├─────┼─┤
>>>> │Tally│1│
>>>> └─────┴─┘
>>>>      f ,1    NB. pass an array of one scalar
>>>> ┌─────┬─┐
>>>> │Rank │1│
>>>> ├─────┼─┤
>>>> │Shape│1│
>>>> ├─────┼─┤
>>>> │Tally│1│
>>>> └─────┴─┘
>>>>      f 1 2   NB. pass an array of two scalars
>>>> ┌─────┬─┐
>>>> │Rank │1│
>>>> ├─────┼─┤
>>>> │Shape│2│
>>>> ├─────┼─┤
>>>> │Tally│2│
>>>> └─────┴─┘
>>>>      f 0$1   NB. pass an empty array (zero shape)
>>>> ┌─────┬─┐
>>>> │Rank │1│
>>>> ├─────┼─┤
>>>> │Shape│0│
>>>> ├─────┼─┤
>>>> │Tally│0│
>>>> └─────┴─┘
>>>>      f ''$1  NB. pass a null rank object (scalar)
>>>> ┌─────┬─┐
>>>> │Rank │0│
>>>> ├─────┼─┤
>>>> │Shape│ │
>>>> ├─────┼─┤
>>>> │Tally│1│
>>>> └─────┴─┘
>>> Alan
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to