Fair enough! I was looking at the wrong inputs. Must be g that "fails"! So g is even worse than I thought!
My later remarks about looking at primes should still be pertinent, though. M On 02/11/2011 2:06 PM, Raul Miller wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 9:57 AM, Mike Day<[email protected]> wrote: >> No problems so far, but consider: >> |:g ^:(10+i.10) 1 1 >> 36288 99168 90016 70208 82912 24368 89888 28096 5728 8832 >> 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 >> >> f"0 ] 10 + i. 10 >> 36288 99168 90016 70208 82912 74368 89888 28096 5728 8832 >> >> But >> 82912 * 15 >> 1243680 >> >> ... so I think that 24368 is correct, but can't quite see >> why f is failing at 15, when g doesn't! > f&>14 15 > 82912 74368 > ,.!14 15x > 87178291200 > 1307674368000 > > I do not think f is failing at 15. > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
