Debugger gets really confused when you try to debug an explicit definition within a tacit one.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:49 AM, Devon McCormick <[email protected]> wrote: > Since you know you want the function to applied with rank 1, you should > probably build it into the definition, e.g. > > timeToMove=: ((timeToRotate &: azimuth) >. (timeToAscend &: > elevation))"1 > left timeToMove right > 0.15 0.45 1.15 > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Daniel Lyons <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > > > On Nov 15, 2011, at 5:27 AM, Kip Murray wrote: > > > > > I cannot duplicate your error. > > > > Trying it again this morning, I see I must have had a bad definition in > my > > session. Loading from the file I get the same behavior as you and Raul. > > Sorry about that! > > > > > > > From your definitions I get > > > > > > left timeToMove right > > > 0.25 0.45 > > > > > > You might notice > > > > > > left > > > 0 1 > > > 2 3 > > > 4 5 > > > elevation left > > > 2 3 > > > elevation"1 left > > > 1 3 5 > > > > > > Which do you want? > > > > > > Well, the idea is to treat each row analogously to a C struct. I think > > because they're all numbers I'm not having to box the values, but at any > > rate, I want a row-by-row application, so given the left and right I sent > > before, I want three numbers, as in elevation"1 there. Despite not having > > the error, the "1 rank version of these functions is still the one I > want. > > > > Thanks again, > > > > — > > Daniel Lyons > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > > > > > -- > Devon McCormick, CFA > ^me^ at acm. > org is my > preferred e-mail > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
