Ok, this suggests a completely different design.

That said, when you say "number each row in the output" do you mean event
number or do you mean line number?   I agree that event number is implicit.

-- 
Raul

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 11:47 PM, Skip Cave <[email protected]> wrote:

> Raul,
>
> I'm using tags3 for your function:
>
>   tags3
> ┌──────┬───┬─────────┬───┬────
> ───────────────────────┬───┐
>
> │STATUS│   │RESULT[0]│   │CONFIDENCE[0]             =│   │
> └──────┴───┴─────────┴───┴───────────────────────────┴───┘
>
> The empty boxes actually carry the CR, LF, TAB character string defining
> the closing tag for each parameter..
>
> tags6 is the tag string for *Arie's* function:
>  tags6
> ┌──────┬──────┬─────────┬─────────────┬──────────────────┐
> │start{│STATUS│RESULT[0]│CONFIDENCE[0]│UTTERANCE_FILENAME│
> └──────┴──────┴─────────┴─────────────┴──────────────────┘
>
> Arie uses the first element of his tag string to define the string that
> starts each event. In our case that is the 'start{' string which identifies
> the start of each event. Arie assumes that every line ends in CR, LF, TAB.
> So he doesn't need to have the closing tag specified for each parameter.
>
> The more I look over the data, the more I think that the function should
> capture EVERY event in the log. Every event starts with 'start{' and ends
> with '}end', so it is easy to spot all the events. If a specific event has
> NO matching parameter tags in it, then the output will have a row of empty
> boxes in it, The number of boxed columns in the output will be the number
> of parameters asked for in the tag list. The number of boxed rows in the
> output will be the total number of events in the whole text log file.
>
> I think I also need to number each row in the output. However that is one
> thing I CAN do myself.
>
> Skip
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > There are other reasons why mine might stop (like missing end tags).
> >
> > What definition are you using for tags6?
> >
> > --
> > Raul
> >
> > > > >> > Raul
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to