It looks better like this
u:&.>0,&.>3 u: 16 16 $a.
2012/2/4 Björn Helgason <gos...@gmail.com>
> 32 16 $;u:&.>0,&.>3 u: 16 16 $a.
>
>
>
>
> ┌┬┐├┼┤└┴
> ┘│─
> !"#$%&'
> ()*+,-./
> 01234567
> 89:;<=>?
> @ABCDEFG
> HIJKLMNO
> PQRSTUVW
> XYZ[\]^_
> `abcdefg
> hijklmno
> pqrstuvw
> xyz{|}~
> € ‚ƒ„…†‡
> ˆ‰Š‹Œ Ž
> ‘’“”•–—
> ˜™š›œ žŸ
> ¡¢£¤¥¦§
> ¨©ª«¬®¯
> °±²³´µ¶·
> ¸¹º»¼½¾¿
> ÀÁÂÃÄÅÆÇ
> ÈÉÊËÌÍÎÏ
> ÐÑÒÓÔÕÖ×
> ØÙÚÛÜÝÞß
> àáâãäåæç
> èéêëìíîï
> ðñòóôõö÷
> øùúûüýþÿ
>
>
> 2012/2/4 Björn Helgason <gos...@gmail.com>
>
>> In JHS
>>
>> 16 16$;u:&.>0,&.>3 u: 16 16 $a.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ┌┬┐├┼┤└┴
>> ┘│─
>> !"#$%&'
>> ()*+,-./
>> 01234567
>> 89:;<=>?
>> @ABCDEFG
>> HIJKLMNO
>> PQRSTUVW
>> XYZ[\]^_
>> `abcdefg
>> hijklmno
>> pqrstuvw
>> xyz{|}~
>>
>>
>> 2012/2/4 Fraser Jackson <fraser.jack...@xtra.co.nz>
>>
>>> In J701jhs the display character choice destroys the elegance of the
>>> boxing
>>> and LF, TAB and CR destroy the tidy appearance of the boxing.
>>>
>>>
>>> Is it possible to do better with both the J701 versions?
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
