Linda wrote:
> Design a function with no restrictions 
> on style or specific functions.

I'm glad the constraints on style and presentation were lifted.  

Linda wrote:
> PLEASE DO NOT RESPOND UNTIL 2/22/2012

Raul responded:
>  Please send again when we 
>  can respond -- I will read it then.


I also think the restriction on response time should be lifted.  I believe
that these challenges would see a lot more uptake and participation if they
were unfettered by artificial restrictions.

I suggest that those who need a little extra time to solve the puzzle are
the ones who should exercise restraint.  When a puzzle is posted, chances
are most responses are going to contain spoilers (a smaller number may ask
for clarifications or include digressions).  So, the rule is: if you don't
want help solving the puzzle, don't read the thread until you're done.
Pretty easy. (I do this all the time with the more challenging J puzzles
posted here.)

This approach has the added benefit of not imposing a deadline on people who
need more time than originally allotted (e.g., for those who are on holiday
until 2/22/2012 and won't even see the puzzle til they get back).

So, I'm just going to be bold here and adopt this convention. Let's see what
happens.  

**SPOILER AFTER 15 BLANK LINES**














           gw =: ' '&, {~ #\ (- (|. 1j1&#)"_1 >:@?) #

           gw 'many'
           m    
          n m   
         n a y  
        a y n m 

           gw 'many'
           n    
          a y   
         m y a  
        n y m a 

           gw 'cherrytrees'
                  t           
                 r e          
                e r e         
               r e e y        
              t e c h e       
             r r r e h e      
            e e c s t r h     
           r s h e r y c t    
          e s e y c r e r r   
         s h c e r e r r e y  
        s c e r r e r h e y t 

           a=:gw '%%%####'
           a,.a,.a,.a
              #             #             #             #       
             % #           % #           % #           % #      
            # % #         # % #         # % #         # % #     
           # % # %       # % # %       # % # %       # % # %    
          % # # # %     % # # # %     % # # # %     % # # # %   
         # % # % # #   # % # % # #   # % # % # #   # % # % # #  
        # # # % % % # # # # % % % # # # # % % % # # # # % % % # 
           

-Dan

PS: >:@?  here is a great example of the benefits and uses of  @  (in the
sense that  @:  is not a suitable replacement, and therefore neither is  [:
>: ?  or  1 + ?  etc.  You'd have to use circumlocutions like  ([: >: ?)"0
.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to