On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Paul Jackson <plj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Congratulations on creating a reference to x which is never reached.  While
> it does mean my rules for creating a definition which is not used until
> execution time shouldn't have warned against x in the monadic definition,
> the rest of the warnings about such uses of x seem worth communicating to
> someone learning J.

It's probably good practice to require an explicit y and an explicit u
or m, when you want the explicit definition for an adverb or
conjunction to be used as the body of the derived verb.

I mentioned the other possibilities purely for reference purposes.

-- 
Raul
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to