thanks
as you see from the out of order posts i was continuing in the right
direction
and as i learn more about j it will probably make sense why that is
reasonable
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:38 PM, ed bierly <ebie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> NB. the implementation of list_z_ seems to invoke this special case for x
> and y
>
> (4 !: 1)0 1 2 3
> ┌─┬─┬─┐
> │x│y│z│
> └─┴─┴─┘
> names
> list_z_@nl
> list_z_
> 3 : 0
> w=. {.wcsize''
> w list y
> :
> if. 0=#y do. i.0 0 return. end.
> if. 2>#$y=. >y do.
> d=. (' ',LF) {~ LF e. y=. toJ ": y
> y=. [;._2 y, d #~ d ~: {: y
> end.
> y=. y-. ' '{.~ c=. {:$ y=. (": y),.' '
> (- 1>. <. x % c) ;\ <"1 y
> )
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:20 PM, ed bierly <ebie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> NB. http://www.jsoftware.com/docs/help701/learning/24.htm
>>
>> (0 !: 0) < 'economic.ijs'
>>
>> names''
>> p s
>>
>> y
>> 1932 1934 1957 1969 1972
>>
>> NB. something about x and y only?
>>
>> (0 : 0) (1 !: 2) < 'test.ijs'
>> x=:'ed'
>> y=:'is'
>> z=:'confused'
>> )
>> clear'base'
>>
>> names''
>> (0 !: 0) < 'test.ijs'
>> names''
>> z
>>
>>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
