On Thu, 17 Feb 2022 at 22:35, Kristian Evers via PROJ <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the thorough explanation, Bas. It's much appreciated! > > Even, Mike: I haven't got strong opinions on this. Do you guys think it is > worth the hassle to switch to the model Bas describes here?
Thanks for the ideas Bas! I like it, as it's much simpler to see one incrementer. If we decide to keep the incremented SONAME, then yes, let's implement a simpler versioning for PROJ 9.0RC2. But if we decide to keep the previous SONAME (due to no API/ABI break), then keep it libtool-style until the next API/ABI break. _______________________________________________ PROJ mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
