I’m changing my vote to a +1 as well. Thanks for clearing up the details. Let’s get proj.org <http://proj.org/> moved to RTD once the payment follows through.
/Kristian > On 4 Feb 2023, at 19.19, Kurt Schwehr <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 KurtS > > Revising my vote after looking > https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/pull/3538 > <https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/pull/3538> and learning more about read the > docs. > > The docs are already amazing, but this is awesome. Thank you to all who > contributed. > > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2023, 11:40 AM Kurt Schwehr <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > +0 KurtS > > It sounds totally reasonable, the benefits seem cool, and the demo looks > great. > However, I'd like to know a bit more about what is involved with using RTD > for proj.org <http://proj.org/>. > > > On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 11:22 AM Even Rouault <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > +1 Even > > And thanks to Howard & Mike for implementing this. > > Le 03/02/2023 à 20:00, Howard Butler a écrit : >> All, >> >> I would like to motion to migrate proj.org <http://proj.org/> from our >> self-managed GitHub Pages-based deployment to one based on ReadTheDocs >> (RTD). The new deployment will host multi-versioned content all the way back >> to 5.0 thanks to Mike Taves. >> >> As I mentioned in a previous email, the RTD deployment is temporarily >> pointed at https://pointcloud.org <https://pointcloud.org/> to simulate a >> domain deployment on OSGeo's DNS infrastructure. When the motion passes, we >> will simply move the pointer to proj.org <http://proj.org/> The deployment >> currently has RTD's ad network enabled, but this will be removed once the >> sponsorship purchase process completes its move through OSGeo. The migration >> to RTD brings us some useful benefits such as documentation rendering in >> PRs, convenient multi-versioned doc hosting, and a reduction of our >> volunteer time consumed by documentation system management. >> >> PROJ's docs are comprehensive, thorough, and beautiful, and they rival the >> Snyder book for projection math, examples, and graphics. Thank you to all of >> the contributors who have helped bring PROJ's docs forward to a much better >> place [1]. >> >> + 1 >> >> Howard >> >> >> [1] We're a long way past the Trac wiki and some outbound pointers >> https://web.archive.org/web/20140226080407/trac.osgeo.org/proj >> <https://web.archive.org/web/20140226080407/trac.osgeo.org/proj> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PROJ mailing list >> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj >> <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj> > -- > http://www.spatialys.com <http://www.spatialys.com/> > My software is free, but my time generally not. > _______________________________________________ > PROJ mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj > <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj> > _______________________________________________ > PROJ mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
_______________________________________________ PROJ mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
