ER wrote:
>The null transformation between ETRS89 and ETRF2014 comes with the
definition of the datum ensemble ETRS89 (cf change
https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/issues/3263
<https://github.com/OSGeo/PROJ/issues/3263>)
The problem is not the null transformation between the ensemble and
its members, but that the transformation route through ETRF2014 is
recommended. In my opinion, the route trough ETRF2000 should be the
default. Not only for the Netherlands but, for Europe in general.
PROJ has no idea of what is recommended/preferred by European
geodestists ;-) It only trusts records in its database.
Thus ETRS89 -> ETRF2000 -> ITRF2000 -> ITRF2014 instead of ETRS89 ->
ETRF2014 -> ITRF2014. What makes PROJ choose the latter?
PROJ can only infer pipelines with at most one intermediate CRS. If you
want ETRS89 -> ETRF2000 -> ITRF2000 -> ITRF2014, you need an explicit
concatenated operation chaining the 3 individual steps.
Even
--
http://www.spatialys.com
My software is free, but my time generally not.
_______________________________________________
PROJ mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
