Charles Karney <charles.kar...@gmail.com> writes: > I recommend you start with the sin(-90) != -1 failure. In particular > can you check the inputs > > x, (double)qd > > and outputs > > r, q > > of the call to remquo in sincosdx in geodesic.c line 179. Buggy > implementations of remquo have been a problem in the past.
You are spot on; my libm remquo is buggy. I'm working on fixing that, and then will see what remains. (Thus far, I have received no reports of proj tests passing on a platform other than linux/mac/windows.) _______________________________________________ PROJ mailing list PROJ@lists.osgeo.org https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/proj
