Hi, >> >> As the protocol is inherently client-server, the same ontology >> (dictionary) can be (re-)used among different Invenio instances. It is >> not a toy. I haven't been able to make any noticeable use in my >> instance even massively querying it. You can follow part of my >> experiments here: >> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.protocols.dict.user >> >> Sorry, I had to say it, > > actually this is a very cool hack :-) Indeed it might be very useful for > the use case of bibclassify, where the goal is (AFAIK) to find the most
I agree this is cool, but something doesn't fit, at least I don't understand how this could be used for the task of bibclassify, the dict is good if you know (more or less) what you are looking for, but the task of bibclassify is to find entities inside the fulltext - and to find that out, bibclassify has to search for it - and it is not exactly the same thing as the spell checking. I must be missing something, could you explain to me what advantage at all there would be in using the dict? As a fast cache of single level entries? I could see how it would be more useful for the cache, citation links etc., but not for bibclassify. > represented keywords in a text. Indeed one might think to take the terms > of these ontologies and create dictionaries for dict... I don't know > though if this is can be used in semen (Roman?) but that is another semen is indeed other topic ;-) Cheers, roman > topic :-) > > Cheers! > Sam > > -- > Samuele Kaplun > Invenio Developer ** <http://invenio-software.org/> > >
