On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Roman Chyla wrote: > because index is created by a writer which has instant access to the > invenio, and because values are only indexed (not stored - it is the > invenio, that takes care of that from database), those issues are > eliminated. The lucene is there as a search provider, returning docids > only
For the benefit of everyone not present today, we also discussed that Solr might not need data objects stored for its faceting either, which gives us this nice possibility of (1) Invenio storing data objects and (2) Invenio/Lucene/Solr storing indexes. This would make the potential co-existence between the tools much easier. (And Invenio modules that may have to rely on instantaneous there/not-there response, such as parts of WebSubmit, could still use MySQL tables.) >>> It took about 12 hours to finish > > that was development time Yes, the processor identity misunderstood. :) > it was agreed we will do some tests when we find the box with data > (all inspire records), some time this week The freeest one so far seems to be INSPIRETEST, so maybe we shall borrow its cycles for a throw-away testing of Lucene re-indexing the whole INSPIRE later this week. Best regards -- Tibor Simko
