On Thu, 08 Apr 2010, Piotr Praczyk wrote: > I haven't tried using new JQuery with BibEdit yet, but using the > newest versionis usually a good idea. What about switching directly > after Invenio 1.0 is released ?
Yes. One more thing to do before 1.0 in the jQuery department: there are still some ``svn/tags/latest'' parts in install-jquery-plugins. This is too bleeding edge, and we have been bitten by this in the past, so to speak, e.g. file renames in 0c841f12e403c0bdb9cc38dd9a7cfbd2d3e4ff45, e.g. calendar changes in e2a978e7746fb2a929e58c23034f4e216bf6afe2. So it would be good to go through the whole install-jquery-plugins target and change remaining parts in order to wget always some very specific version of a jQuery library, as is needed, like in my changes mentioned above. (I have been doing that as was necessary for merging, I have not gone systematically through every jQuery dependency we have.) Can you please look at that? If there is a trouble with some dependency lib URL stability, or versions are lacking on the remote site, then we can host the dependency on cdsware.cern.ch site, like the other installation files, e.g. demo records, e.g. keyword ontologies. > Concerning downloading the scrips from a single location. In general I > am for it, but I think it should be configurable. I can imagine > Invenio installations running in some separated network. In such a > case scripts should be hosted too. Indeed. Also, it would require our users to JS-white-list Google servers, which some may be reluctant to do. I think the time has not come yet for that Google dream :) so we can revisit this point later. Best regards -- Tibor Simko ** CERN Document Server ** <http://cds.cern.ch/>
