In data mercoledì 01 agosto 2007, Tibor Simko scribacchiaste dette parole:
> Hi Sam and Tony:
>
> What is the status of this thing -- have you added it?
>
> I think we can easily avoid it, because refextract has to have an
> associated daemon anyway that would look inside the database to fetch
> the list of recIDs to extract references from -- that is, for new
> records and for records with modified PDF files since the last run.
> This daemon, let's call it 'refextractadmin', will normally run via
> bibsched periodically and will invoke its 'refextract' slave program
> only for good (main) PDF files. In this way no duplicate '.type'
> hidden file would be needed.
>
> Best regards
Hi Tibor,
yes it was added, because I was migrating documents through pcuds85, so the
database wasn't available to Tony, but AFS was. So this .type was easily
added, as a temporay workaround. When fulltextes will be referenced by the
production machine I think there won't be problems in removing .type.
Would be this a good solution?
Best regards,
Samuele
--
.O.
..O
OOO
