On 08/30/2011 07:49 AM, Invenio Trac wrote: > It is not nice to have `dateutils.py` living in the INSPIRE repository > that would overwrite `dateutils.py` of the Invenio repository, because > this may cause trouble with the updates (e.g. what if we change dateutils > API inside Invenio). If there are some dateutils changes that are needed > for INSPIRE, then these should be committed back to upstream Invenio > dateutils with proper flags that would influence its behaviour. > > As far as I am concerned, the whole `miscutil` tree of the INSPIRE > repository can be removed. For example, it is not plugged into the top- > level `Makefile`, so INSPIRE's dateutils is not installed and is not used. > If you agree that it can be removed, then let's remove it.
I must admit, I've always been a bit fuzzy on the purpose of 'miscutil'. On the other hand, Valkyrie's stuff for deploying a monkey-patch to python-dateutil post-installation needs to live somewhere, and this seems like it could be a good place. (which reminds me, I should probably get that deployed.) Joe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
