On Wed, 20 Feb 2013, Alexander Wagner wrote: > I understood this but didn't understand why the high level api > returned more results for query that went basically exact match on > logical field x. I guess I'll understand that from the docs, and if > not I'll ask again :)
Usually it is the other way round, i.e. p_r_s() returns less hits than s_p(). This is because p_r_s() filters collections while s_p() searches regardless of collection. Hence the latter may get restricted records, deleted records, and whatnot. Was it really the other way round, p_r_s() giving more records than s_p() in your case? If so, we should have closer look. Best regards -- Tibor Simko
