Hello Alexander, [...] > Ok, that was indeed easy enough, and it solves the problem > for me in detailed record view. However, I still get no > titles displayed when browsing a collection. All I get is > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Latest additions: > > 2010-01-05 > 14:28 > Detailed record - Similar records > 2010-01-05 > 14:28 > Detailed record - Similar records > 2010-01-05 > 14:28 > Detailed record - Similar records > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Once I click on Detailed record, all titles show up. And of > course I can search for the titles (that worked before > anyway).
There are a couple of steps involved here. One is the recreation of the brief records, that in general should be automatic, but not when the template is changed. Just run bibreformat --all, and wait until those already formatted records are reloaded into the database. Monitor it with bibsched. Then you must refresh the initial static pages for the collections, running webcoll, maybe with --force. > Now, I've other collections where the indicators for 245 are > set to <blank><blank> and there it works perfectly. (We > harvested some data via OAI, I added soem database entries > where I explicitly cleaned the indicators). Again, it depends on how those display definitions are set. If a title is when tag is 245 and indicators are blank, those titles are not shown. With wildcards as indicators, they show up. > Any hints about this issue? > > Diving a bit around in this issue, shouldn't it be the > output format for brief that has to be adoped? Isn't that an > issue of some of the reformaters or do I get the idea of > them wrong? I hope this is explained above. If not, please insist. I'd appreciate some feedback by the CERN developers about this indicators policy in the default values of the software, because I think it causes unnecessary trouble for new adopters. It also happens in most other formatters, not only HTML: Dublin Core, Refworks, EndNote, field definitions, etc. Best regards, Ferran
