Hi, On Sat Jan 05, 2008 at 14:49:07 -0700, dann frazier wrote: > On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 01:30:43PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > > * dann frazier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080105 00:03]: > > > I talked to zobel about this, and he also agrees to the use of p-u, as > > > long as all etch 1/2 changes occur in the form of new packages. So, > > > sounds like consensus to me. > > > > One thing I spoke with Martin about as well were the version numbers, > > and he wants "obvious" ones for etch-and-half, like etchnhalf (e.g. > > 3.1dfsg-8etchnhalf1, which is even larger by dpkg the > > 3.1dfsg-8etch1). I think I agree with the obvious version numbers too. > > Ok - and I also assume all version numbers should be less than their > lenny/sid counterparts - e.g., linux-2.6 should be something like > 2.6.23-1~etchnahalf1
sounds reasonable. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life No manual entry for real-life -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
