On Thu, 03 Apr 2014, Tibor Simko wrote: > On Thu, 03 Apr 2014, Yoan Blanc wrote: >> Is BibJSON really more interesting than JSON-LD? > > Nope :) But it's quite a step forward from classical techniques like > exchanging DC like formats via OAI-PMH that are still pretty much the > common practice. If our internal RecJSON format is exchangeable > easily, then so much the better.
BTW see also the following article on BibJSON <-> JSON-LD: http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/7949 Unfortunately we did not get yet to fully writing up our own JSONAlchemy documentation, with separate-but-linked Record JSON Store, Document JSON Store, Annotations JSON Store, with model specification and validation, etc. Still coming. Best regards -- Tibor Simko
