Hello Samuelle, [...] >> What is the current practice? If the id should appear in each >> CFG_OAI_SET_FIELD (024, in our case), I'll try to patch our version as >> soon as possible, because my second OAI set must contain many more >> records and I cannot reindexing it more than once.
[...] > IMHO, I would say the best practice to be future-compatible is to have > only one field with the only ID and repetitive $9 subfields for the > sets. Great, I also thought about this possibility after sending my message. Thanks for your response. That was what I was looking for. Ferran
