- LQDN is behind sous-surveillance.fr, not the associations who signed - April, major Free Software association in France, endorsed it - Admittedly I could have sent a mail to the list, but it's been dead ever since people like you left the ship, so I didn't think about it. Plus it was a fast track law project, which didn't help. - You setup the project@ mailing list, I don't remember changing the conf. - More to the point: are you interested in joining back Gna? We're looking for volunteers and I'll have less time soon.
Cheers! Sylvain On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 09:24:06PM +0200, Mathieu Roy wrote: > Hi Sylvain, > > On Friday 04 September 2015 20:33:58 [email protected] wrote: > > Mathieu, > > > > Your e-mail is so off that I don't know where to begin with. > > What is so off to me is to find on gna links to extreme left wing entities > that I would not even start dare to comment. > I did not even said that was such a shame, even though it would not be > unlikely to think so. LDH, Syndicat de la Magistrature, Collectif Bordelais > contre les abus policiers, etc. Do you even know who you are dealing with, > what are their political statements, on what manifesto they are based on? > > No, I did not say what I think about these entities that I know well. To me > it > just as much as putting a banner for Le Front de Gauche or Le Front National. > Not that it is bad per se, depends on your opinions I guess. I just said: was > there ever a debate about this, or just a single explanation? > > > > I think that the couple people who keep Gna! alive have better to do > > with their contribution time than answer. You disappoint me. > > Well, gna was not thought as an autocracy. It is exactly against and because > of autocratic behavior that it was created. > http://about.gna.org/ reminds of that: to be handled in a democratic way. > Which mean that people can have their say, even though if, as you indirectly > pointed out, the 2% that are actually doing shit will have the last word > nonetheless. > > So I am having my say and it is: I m outraged with political statement > completely out of scope of libre software on the front page of gna. > What you do with this is beyond me, we can all be somehow disappointed. I can > live with this disappointement, I ll forget all about it in 10 minutes. > > > > PS: you're not subscribed to project@ with this e-mail address, which > > explain the rejection you received. Nothing that warrants a "WTF". > > (I cannot remember which or which email I was using when I created the list, > nonetheless it should moderate post on the list for non subscribers instead > of a definitive reject, especially not when the failsafe address is not > configured to work) _______________________________________________ Project mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/project
