Hi, On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 02:37:00PM -0500, Bill Auger wrote: > i just heard about this on the fsf-repo-criteria mailing list
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/repo-criteria-discuss/2017-02/msg00000.html OK. "several independant persons are in contact regarding possible transfer of all data to another service" Nobody contacted us at that date. In between a Savannah admin reached privately for info but no news since then. For now we have no plan to mass-migrate anything, given the technical, time and legal issues related to such a move. > i just wanted to extend an olive branch to the gna admins and users on > behalf of notabug - notabug.org is a non-commercial, community operated git > hosting service that, next to gna and savanah, is probably the most > libre-conscious of any of the alternatives that gna users may be looking > toward - perhaps gna and notabug together can work out a less abrupt > transition for gna users if, and when, that sad day may arive [We're not at war ("olive branch"?) but I see the intent.] Did you consider getting listed at https://www.gnu.org/software/repo-criteria-evaluation.en.html ? > i have been trying to post this to the mailing list but it seems to be a > problem > > "Your message couldn't be delivered to [email protected] because the > remote server is misconfigured. See technical details below for more > information. The response from the remote server was: > 550 relay not permitted" AFAICS you were temporarily blacklisted due to a transient SPF error. Cheers! Sylvain _______________________________________________ Project mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/project
