Fabio Serra wrote:

Yes, I'm sure you would release a compatible version asap, in fact my doubts were mainly theoretical. Anyway, what I don't have understood is what are the technical reasons because you decided to develop the jslib as an extension. I prefer to include the libraries directly in my projects because in this way I have more control. I can have different versions for different projects and I don't have to worry if something that can broken my extension changes. In the same way I would include some dojo or mochikit libraries I'd like to do the same with the jslib. I know that jslib are MPL so I can change any reference from chrome://jslib/content to point to my extension and probably (I'm not sure I don't know jslib very well) everything keeps working, but every time a new jslib version is released I need to merge the files. So, doesn't exists a jslib version that can be used directly inside a one's extension (eg: chrome://myexts/content/jlib)? It could be a good idea to develop a jslib version that is not dependent from the EM and that can be simply included in the extension?

Other extension authors have bundled jsLib inside their packages before. I can't think of an example off-hand.

Pete's the best person to advise on the best way to handle this however.

--
Brian King
www.mozdev.org - free project hosting for the Mozilla community

_______________________________________________
Project_owners mailing list
[email protected]
http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners

Reply via email to