I'm sorry, i got it... the idea it's that the client should know the hash before download it. But i see no sense here, except to download an specified version of a file. You should update every link that point to your file in case you update it.
I don't know, i really don't understand the use of it... On 7/10/07, Ezequiel Calderara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
mmm i don't know much, and i don't know if i understood it clearly... But isn't easier to use an Http-Header with the hash... it could work for every document, files, images even webpages. I don't know if it exists, but if it's implemented or exists it would be much useful than having even more long urls... well, it's just an opinion. On 7/10/07, Benoit Renard, msnmsgr <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > Gervase Markham's (Mozilla Corporation) proposal > > For future reference, I'd like to note that Gerv is an employee of the > Mozilla /Foundation/. > _______________________________________________ > Project_owners mailing list > [email protected] > http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners > -- ______ Ezequiel. Http://www.ironicnet.com
-- ______ Ezequiel. Http://www.ironicnet.com
_______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list [email protected] http://mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
