Eric H. Jung wrote: > --- Robert Kaiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> The review process ensures that all add-ons available from that site are >> usable, reasonable quality and not malware, which the uncontrolled >> process of most other sites can't even nearly guarantee. Of course, that >> process also comes with the cost of being slower. >> > > And you are free to consume the time of your life anyway you see fit, even if > that means reviewing > addons from now until the end of your days. Just don't expect me to join you > :) > >> What I decide is that we don't link mozdev but AMO as the "Add-Ons" link >> on the SeaMonkey project website. >> >> We surely want to link resources where people can get other add-ons, but >> not as a link on the front page or the main menu, probably either on our >> community page or in the documentation section of the website. And that >> is all the original discussion on mozilla.support.seamonkey (which >> Michael partly cited) was about. >> > > Whether or not a link is made to mozdev on some product page isn't important > to me.
Me neither, and I made it clear, or at least I tried, that I was acting as an 'ambassador' for other people who are concerned about their add-ons being or getting in the sandbox for so long, leaving people to begging and even paying money to get a review job done. > I am merely > defending mozdev from your narrow description of its services and uses. > Perhaps you and Michael > should duke it out in private. > > Eric What we should all do is provide constructive feedback for the 'new website' i.e. the changes needed to improve mozdev.org and forget about the link, just like me. -- Michael Vincent van Rantwijk - MultiZilla Project Team Lead - XUL Boot Camp Staff member (ActiveState Training Partner) - iPhone Application Developer _______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
