On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 1:22 PM, John Woods <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I should also add that it seems that if something is not signed... > Firefox will disable any update checking. (Whaaaaaaaaat!) > > I only caught that message once in my testing of a compatibility release... > so I am still not sure of what criteria needs to pass... but I think > it was upgrade > checking becoming disabled without a signed xpi. >
No, the xpi does not need to be signed. FF3.0 only requires that update.rdf is either signed or that it's provided via https://, as it would be when hosting on amo. Check the archives of this mailing list for details. - Godmar _______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
