Didn't even get to complete my mail writing before you wrote it. But yea, that's pretty much the question.
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:52 AM, Eric Jung <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 11:45 PM, Philip Chee <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:58:24 -0400, Eric Jung wrote: >> >> > The policy is here: >> > http://www.mozdev.org/projects/adoption.html >> > > Jesper Hansen mentioned an important point which we should consider. Some > projects on mozdev only release their source code with an open-source > license. Their website, documentation, graphics, name, logo, etc. aren't > freely redistributable. Does this mean those projects don't apply to the > adoption policy? > > >> > Note this is only for the mozdev side of things. It doesn't handle >> adoption >> > of the AMO side of things. I don't think AMO has an adoption policy >> > currently. I'll look into that for you. >> >> I recently asked hijax about this (there is an open bug actually[1]) but >> the answer seems to be "it's still up in the air". >> >> By the way, will AMO recognize a mozdev project takeover/adoption if the >> extension is a mozdev project but also hosted on AMO? It would be silly >> if two different people took over an extension, one on AMO and another >> one on mozdev. >> >> > There is no such recognition, and yes, that would be silly. Could you raise > it in the bug you mention? > > > _______________________________________________ > Project_owners mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners > >
_______________________________________________ Project_owners mailing list [email protected] https://www.mozdev.org/mailman/listinfo/project_owners
